Jump to content

Future thoughts...


al k

Recommended Posts

...since the boards have been a bit quiet lately, and I'm really missing the various opinions and expertise y'all have shared on drives, C&C, and get togethers, I thought I'd pose a question for discussion:

 

The apparent war on ICE vehicles is seemingly gaining momentum world-wide, how long do you think it will be before gas prices and/or government restrictions make owning an ICE vehicle economically undesirable, and our beloved P-cars become more difficult to own?

 

Secondly, are you betting on the green lobby to ultimately fail and a return to a more sustainable or progressive O&G "business as usual", or will the green economics themselves prove to be unsustainable?

 

No right/wrong answers or opinions, and no intent to start a keyboard war, just interested in thoughts?

 

Al

Link to comment

The ICE platform may become less desirable for some. As for us that enjoy the wrenching and driving I don?t believe the desire will ever go. There are still people that run steam because they love it. I think that will be the same for ICE. Let be real also Al we are both over the hill we don?t need to worry about any time lines.

 

Some day fuel will disappear and we will be reliant on other forms of energy. Currently we don?t have the infrastructure to sustain all electric nor the capacity with out oil and gas to produce it. That will change in the future and I believe the only way will be nuclear that is not the best for the environment either. Finding something that is environmentally friendly and sustainable for future energy needs I?m not sure if I will se it in my lifetime.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
KMR 968 Turbo

Scenario #1: World eliminates the ICE through legislation that starts by taxing and then rationing fuel making ownership difficult and expensive. Autonomous self driving electric cars roam the streets looking for patrons. Range no longer a concern as when car gets low another takes it's place. You no longer own a car. Instead you have a car service that you pay a monthly subscription for. You book what you want using your smart device. Not being required to drive leads to in transit amenities (connectivity, luxury, etc.) being more important than things like performance or exterior style. Basically the car becomes an appliance and you no longer worry about repairs, mileage, insurance or anything else. Just choose the subscription plan that suits you and carry on. Car "enthusiasts" are limited to outings at facilities where they pay to enjoy their fossil fuel relics. Much like the transition from horses to autos the basic fossil fuel people carrier becomes practically worthless. Upper echelon folks collect prized models with lineage that they can enjoy for limited use. However, as parts supply become more scarce and operating costs increase it becomes more and more difficult to sustain ICE usage.

 

Scenario #2: The complexity of changing everything to zero emissions takes decades to accomplish. During the transition fossil fuel use is still a necessity to maintain productive society at it's current standard of living. Governments seize opportunities to tax and spend at will. Things carry on until technology and supply dictate they change.

 

I think Scenario #2 is more likely but am really concerned about Scenario #1 as any regular car guy should be. I am of the firm opinion the younger you are the more you see Scenario #1 as utopia and like it or not our future will eventually be determined by the youth of today.

Link to comment

Scenario #1 is starting to happen in specific cities (Paris is on that path) but it raises major infrastructure challenges.

 

ICE will most likely be part of the picture until there is some major progress done for all these places not having good train or maritime transport.

I believe fuel will stay but less accessible eventually. I like my engine, but if I have to I will switch to electric. Just give me a solid 2 seat car that I can track with, as I have no interest in "regular" vehicles.

 

It's a good point about the youth of today and subscription services, from talking to a few of my interns at work they usually don't want to own things...

Link to comment
sorry Al; I started to reply with thoughts but before I knew it I was down the rabbit hole and facing the Animal Farm/1984 dillema coupled with world population control so I stopped, looked in the garage at the gorgeous P cars and had a cold beer, cheers! Edited by malcolm
added content, deletion of Orwell quotes and end of world by over population thought police

'21 Macan GTS PDK

Miami Blue/Black, 7k kms

 

'93 928 GTS 5 speed

Polar Silver/Linen, 192k kms

 

'88 928 S4 A/T

Black/Ivory, 190k kms

 

'09 Cayenne GTS Tiptronic

Nordic Gold/Black, +336k kms

 

'88 928 S4 A/T

Red/Champagne, 110k miles (US car)

Link to comment

The grid is nowhere close to supporting any type of fast charging in most people's homes. If you look up the rate riders that apply at a very modest 14.4 kW charge at home it would mean an electricity bill of $1200-1400 per month. To put 14.4kW charging at night every night for a year in perspective that is almost 4x the total electricity usage for an average Canadian home to charge one car.

 

People aren't excited about that anymore. It's considered slow now that 130 kW chargers get you topped up in 2 hrs or less. This is requires almost 10x the current and there are several standards for charging ports only two of which are supported by any charging station at once.

 

Solid state batteries will begin to be commercially viable in about 5-7 yrs and with these new batteries we will see a true mass market use case with 5 minute charging and no risk of fire. However the requirements for current will jump again by large margin making all of the charging stations obsolete again for cars with these new batteries. If you can't charge your fancy battery in the fastest way possible and have to use slow chargers then what is the point?

 

The grid and charging infrastructure is hopelessly out of date and what is considered "fast" charging is obsolete in 3 yrs. How are the grid infrastructure and charging stations going to keep up? They need to fix that before EV's can become a mass market product.

 

Forcing everyone to buy EVs when they buy a new car in 2030 is a nice goal but I don't see how the grid and charging stations can keep up to the new standards that come up every 2 or 3 years. Things need to stabilize for infrastructure investment to make sense because these things are long 25+ year bets.

Edited by CarreraGT

'05 CGT/'14 Turbo/'18 GT2RS

Link to comment

Really enjoying this discussion - these are the thoughts that keep me awake at night! My hope is to maximize enjoyment of my ICE cars in the coming years regardless.

 

Brodie makes fun of my love of full-size pickups and SUVs, but the Ford F-150 is an interesting bellwether, as the #1 selling car in the US (589,000 units sold in the US in 2020). Ford launched a mild hybrid version as their top engine option, with 430 hp and 570 lb-ft of torque. A full EV version is rumoured to be on the way (2022, or perhaps in the mid-cycle refresh?). And who can forget our beloved 911, which we all expect will be hybridized in some capacity for the 992.2 version?

 

My personal take: I wouldn't mind driving a hybrid or EV for daily duty, and for my "I can drive to Vancouver this weekend without a second thought" car, since I'll eventually be forced to. In fact, seriously mulling the idea of getting a "PowerBoost" F-150 for daily use. I just hope I can keep the old relics for occaisional/fun use for a long, long time.

Erik

 

2001 911 Turbo X50

1980 911SC - Black, 3.2 litre short stroke SOLD!

2002 BMW M3 - Carbon Black over Cinnamon

Link to comment
KMR 968 Turbo
I read an article last year regarding the transition to all electric cars and how realistic it would be. The writer was London based and put things into perspective from a UK point of view. I don't recall all the numbers exactly but the gist of what was being said was that there was no way it could be done with current technology. They said there were approx 50 million cars in the UK and if you were to replace all of them overnight with electric cars the amount of lithium needed for the batteries would exceed the known world reserves. That is just for one country let alone the world. I believe even the solid state battery technology uses lithium or other rare earth metals and resources would be a problem even with them. So charge rates and vehicle distance considerations are not the only obstacles.
Link to comment

This article is relevant: https://jalopnik.com/massachusetts-follows-california-bans-sale-of-new-gas-1845980321

 

Another US state lining up to ban sales of new gas-powered vehicles. The concerns about infrastructure, being able to transition (building the cars, distributing, maintaining them, etc.) are not addressed but it looks like that legislators hope that a big legal push will force providers to solve the problems.

If more states follow this, I expect that there will be a lot more EVs in the states with a lot of population, but not much will change in the central states where it would just cost too much to switch over that quickly.

Link to comment
The way I see it is that if Calgary was to change out the power supply lines for every neighborhood to support charging stations in every house we would not have to clear snow from the streets. The heat from the underground power draw would melt the snow on contact. haha.

Rob Campbell

 

2001 996, Cabriolet - Rainforest Green Metallic

 

1986 928S, India Red - SOLD

Link to comment
In order to future proof for the next 10 years the city needs to have a grid that allows each home to have atleast 1000 times more power draw. That isn't going to happen without massive subsidies and massive rate hikes. Right now one new EV is capable of 40x. Another 10x increase with solid state or super capacitors and 2 EVs in the household is a massive jump.

'05 CGT/'14 Turbo/'18 GT2RS

Link to comment

I've always lived by the bastardised Charles Darwin quote of "...it is not the strongest nor the fastest that survive, but the one that is the least resistant to change".

 

Having said that, the critical thinker in me agrees with points made by several of you, and while alternate energy sourcing is an ultimately desirable goal, the current insane charge to solely electric continues to baffle me.

 

Politicians globally are demonizing the very O&G industries that are directly and indirectly responsible for the vast majority of humanities greatest leaps forward. They collectively try to demonize and cripple an industry based on partisan reports generated by special interests.

 

Some people are rapturously hailing the success of Elon Musk without acknowledging that without government grants and tax breaks, that Tesla is a failed business model. Now others, Porsche included, are on the bandwagen, (German spelling) but is it to placate woke politicians, or to get on the green government gravy train? I suspect a bit of both.

 

As pointed out in previous replies, I too agree that an electric vehicle could have a spot in my garage, but I am trying to strongly resist the change from my preferred form of transportation...I wonder what Darwin would advise?

Link to comment

I thought I would try to see the other side, so last year I bought a used electric car. Without rewiring my house, it gets charged at 1Kwh, which means I pretty much have to plug in every chance I get.

 

When it is above +8c, this particular car has about 100km range. Plenty for running to town, but not enough to get to Kamloops from Merritt. Good thing I have a ICE backup.

 

Other than that, it?s just another car. Living in the middle of BC, I don?t see a compelling reason to own one, and at 1-2% of new car sales, neither does anyone else.

 

I think I saw somewhere that Ford builds more F150 in a year, than all electrics ever sold combined, but that might have been before the Tesla Model 3.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Perci

 

PCA DE Instructor

 

2014 Cayman S

2000 Boxster S

2000 Carrera

2010 Panamera 4S

1989 928GT

Link to comment

We shouldn?t forget the purpose of electric is to be green. I see no more green in electric than I do in efficient ICE vehicles. I?ll shut up now.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment

Never shut up Mike, (unless it's Mona saying it!)

 

And on that note, the next time someone uses the term "bio-fuels" as a form of "Green Energy", ask them what that really means...if they answer anything but "burning trees, plants or algae", they are not a credible source.

Edited by al k
Link to comment
We shouldn?t forget the purpose of electric is to be green. I see no more green in electric than I do in efficient ICE vehicles. I?ll shut up now.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Classic greenwashing - all that matters is the virtue signalling, and not the actual environmental impact. Plus the opportunities it presents for wealth redistribution and government control over individual behaviour. I'll shut up now.

Erik

 

2001 911 Turbo X50

1980 911SC - Black, 3.2 litre short stroke SOLD!

2002 BMW M3 - Carbon Black over Cinnamon

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...